I chose to focus on Steve Kowit’s “The Grammar Lesson”
because I thought the content of the poem was really important. It is really
common among people today to have a very minimal understand of grammar and for
them to be completely unaware of it. This oblivion has always bothered me, and
clearly it bothered Kowit too since he chose this topic as his subject matter. Kowit
used many poetic techniques. This poem is a villanelle, consisting of five
stanzas of three lines and one of four lines. It has two reoccurring lines: “a
noun’s a thing. A verb’s the thing it does (page 312, line 1)” and “The can of
beets is filled with purple fuzz (page 312, line 3).” Each time these lines are
repeated, their importance and meaning change slightly. Kowit uses perfect
rhymes within these stanzes, rhyming words like “does” and “fuzz,” and slant
rhymes such as “known” and “brown.” He also uses alliteration, meaning the
consonants of multiple words begin the same. Alliteration is pleasing to the
ear when read aloud because it flows so quickly. Examples include “an article,
a can’s a noun (page 312,
line 5),” and “or might be, might
meaning not yet known (page 313,
line 8).” There are also many examples of caesuras throughout the poem, meaning
that a pause occurs within a line. Caesuras change rhythm and can put a greater
emphasis on a certain part because a pause gives you more time to think about what you have just read. I thought the poem was a really creative way to educate
people on the subject of grammar. It is almost comical in how blatant he is; by putting these
grammar rules in such a simple way, he’s sort of subtly calling out peoples’
stupidity.
I liked this poem a lot as well. Kowit made the poem really playful, and that mood helps to give the poem a sardonic style, as if making fun of a grown adult who does not understand simple, proper grammar. Naming the poem "The Grammar Lesson" also contributes to this atmosphere.
ReplyDelete